FBI Begins Investigation Into ‘Deep State’ Operations Of Past Decade
The FBI has quietly commenced a major investigation into what sources characterize as a decade-long operation involving the Democratic Party and deep-state elements, which ranges from allegations of collusion with Russia to the actions of Jack Smith. This investigation could potentially lead to the appointment of a special prosecutor to intervene and reveal a possible coordinated criminal conspiracy aimed at undermining three U.S. elections and damaging President Donald Trump.
Internally dubbed a “grand conspiracy,” the FBI initiated this case several weeks ago following the appointment of new Director Kash Patel. Sources informed Just the News that the investigation could gain momentum if Trump decides to declassify two crucial sets of evidence related to the summer of 2016—what some insiders believe could serve as the catalyst that triggered the entire operation.
One of these documents is a classified annex from the long-suppressed inspector general’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server. Senator Chuck Grassley has requested this annex, which is thought to expose the FBI’s intentional neglect of credible evidence regarding potential criminal behavior.
The other document was concealed in the classified appendix of Special Counsel John Durham’s final report on Russiagate. Durham identified it as “Clinton plan intelligence”—evidence indicating that the CIA was aware the Clinton campaign was attempting to fabricate a narrative of Trump-Russia collusion even before the FBI initiated the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. This probe was heavily reliant on discredited information produced by Clinton associates.
Both pieces of evidence have remained classified for nearly a decade under regulations that safeguard intelligence methods. However, insiders assert that these classifications also protect the government from facing significant accountability.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe recently issued a scathing critique of the intelligence community’s management of the 2016 election interference. He specifically condemned former CIA Director John Brennan for promoting Steele’s fabricated Trump dossier through official channels. Ratcliffe accused Brennan of prioritizing “narrative consistency” over genuine intelligence.
If Trump decides to declassify the Grassley and Durham documents, prosecutors may utilize them as evidence before a grand jury to illustrate a pattern—intelligence agencies allegedly shielding Democrats while employing flawed or fabricated materials to target Trump.
The Trump team is also considering appointing a special counsel to investigate serious allegations reported by Just the News, which state that the FBI received intelligence in August 2020 indicating that China was attempting to inundate the U.S. with counterfeit mail-in ballots to assist Joe Biden in winning the election. Not only did the FBI neglect to take action, but they also reportedly retracted the intelligence and instructed other agencies to destroy it. However, the five-year statute of limitations for that case is set to expire in just weeks, complicating any potential prosecution unless it can be connected to a broader, ongoing criminal conspiracy.
This is where the larger “grand conspiracy” case becomes relevant. By characterizing this as a sustained effort to weaponize government against a political adversary, a prosecutor could associate past events with current ones under a conspiracy or racketeering framework, thereby extending the opportunity for accountability.
Additionally, there is another significant factor: venue.
A grand jury could be convened outside of Washington, D.C., where securing convictions in anti-Trump cases is exceedingly challenging. Voters in D.C. have never favored a Republican presidential candidate, and in 2020, 92.1% of the votes were cast against Trump.
One potential location being evaluated is Florida, where Jack Smith conducted a raid on Mar-a-Lago and charged Trump with mishandling documents, only for the case to be dismissed.
“Florida presents an interesting option because overt acts of the alleged conspiracy took place there and remain within the statute of limitations,” remarked one former federal prosecutor after consulting with Trump officials.
Prosecutors and jurors would finally have the opportunity to pose the essential question: Did Democratic leaders exploit their governmental authority to interfere in the elections of 2016, 2020, and 2024?