FBI Opens Probe Into Alleged Decade-Long Conspiracy to Meddle in Elections
The FBI has discreetly initiated an extensive criminal investigation into what officials are describing as a decade-long “grand conspiracy” orchestrated by Democratic Party operatives and deep-state actors aimed at interfering in various U.S. elections.
FBI Director Kash Patel commenced the investigation a few weeks prior. Sources informed Just the News that this inquiry could potentially result in the appointment of a special prosecutor to assess whether the actions related to Russia collusion, Jack Smith’s prosecutions, and other occurrences constitute a criminal conspiracy.
One source indicated that the case might gain traction if President Trump decides to declassify two sets of still-classified evidence from 2016.
The first set is a classified annex associated with the inspector general’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server—an annex that Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley has pursued for several years. This annex reportedly demonstrates that credible intelligence indicating misconduct was overlooked by the FBI.
The second set of documents pertains to Special Counsel John Durham’s final report, which mentions what it refers to as “Clinton plan intelligence.”
Durham’s report disclosed that U.S. intelligence agencies were aware that the Clinton campaign was promoting a fabricated Russia collusion narrative in 2016 prior to the FBI initiating its now-discredited Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
A significant portion of the evidence utilized in that investigation originated from Clinton allies or the campaign itself. Both sets of documents remain classified and have never been made public. Officials assert that the rationale for the secrecy is that the documents disclose sensitive intelligence-gathering techniques.
Earlier this month, CIA Director John Ratcliffe delivered a harsh critique of how the intelligence community managed claims of Russian interference in 2016.
He accused former CIA Director John Brennan of prioritizing a political narrative over sound analysis and condemned the FBI for assisting in the promotion of the now-discredited Steele dossier.
Ratcliffe subsequently shared online that Trump was subjected to “an unusual and corrupt process” orchestrated by Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey.
Should Trump choose to declassify the Grassley and Durham annexes, prosecutors may utilize them before a grand jury to illustrate a pattern of misconduct—contending that agencies overlooked evidence detrimental to Democrats while actively pursuing Trump.
One option currently under consideration is the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate evidence indicating that the FBI received intelligence in August 2020, which suggested that China was preparing counterfeit mail-in ballots to assist Joe Biden.
Rather than conducting an investigation, the FBI reportedly instructed other agencies to dismiss the intelligence and eliminate the information.
The statute of limitations for that particular incident is due to expire in a few weeks.
However, officials assert that the broader conspiracy case could enable prosecutors to connect both older and more recent misconduct under a single ongoing criminal scheme.
This strategy might also permit a grand jury to be convened outside of Washington, D.C., where conviction rates in cases related to Trump have been nearly nonexistent.
Florida is being evaluated as a potential venue. Officials indicate that some of the overt acts in the alleged conspiracy took place there and are still within the statute of limitations.
A former federal prosecutor informed Just the News that Florida could serve as a sensible venue, referencing the 2022 Mar-a-Lago raid and other incidents. If the case progresses and a special prosecutor is appointed, it could investigate whether years of decisions made by government officials were part of a coordinated effort to sway the elections of 2016, 2020, and 2024.
Democrats, including Clinton, Comey, Brennan, and Smith, have denied any wrongdoing while admitting to certain errors.
However, congressional Republicans have discovered evidence indicating that these errors might have been deliberate.
The investigation is also anticipated to examine several instances related to Trump that depended on erroneous or falsified evidence.
Authorities suspect that the “grand conspiracy” case could connect these occurrences and demonstrate a synchronized attempt to utilize federal law enforcement against a single political adversary across various election cycles.